The Survey for The Standards of Care in Rehabilitation Nurse Specialist / 재활간호학회지

The purpose of this study is to develop the standards of care in rehabilitation nurse specialist. This study was a descriptive survey. The data were collected 143 nurses who were worked in rehabilitation unit at 4 university hospital and 3 rehabilitation center in Korea from Aug. to Nov. 2000. The questionnaire was consisted of 78 items developed by the standards of care in rehabilitation nurse specialist in A.R.N. and the practice contents of care at rehabilitation unit in Korea. Collected data were analyzed by frequency, percentage, mean, S.D. ANOVA The results are as follows 1. For the adequency of the practice contents of rehabilitation nursing, area of skin care is the highest score, and safety, elimination, emotion, respiration, was ordered. 2. The adequency of the practice contents of rehabilitation nursing according to age, educational level. position. clinical experience, clinical experience in rehabilitation unit were significant difference.

Development of a Curriculum for Rehabilitation Nurse Specialist Program / 재활간호학회지

The purpose of this study is to develop a systematic and efficient curriculum for the rehabilitation nurse specialist program. This research was carried out as a group work of 15 experts in order to share vanous opinions about the curriculum. and also through literature review. Articles. curriculums of other Clinical Nurse Specialist Programs. medical laws guidelines. as well as Clinical Nurse Specialist Program from the Korean Nurses Association were reviewed, and the issue was discussed throughly via group meetings. The developed cunicul urn is as follows: 1. Educational philosophy lies in the fact that the rehabilitation nurses support the patients to maximize their potential and functional level. so that they could maintain healthy state and re-adapt to changed environment. Furthermore the rehabilitation nurses are disposed of arbitrary decision power under their own responsibility. thus they take charge of we]fare and healthy environment of the local society through the patients (subjects) and local resources. 2. Educational goals are to train rehabilitation nurse specialist. who correspond to the social needs. so to say. those who have the know]edge and skills for nursing practice, education and research. 3. The curriculum consists of 37 credits, of which 24 credits are based on lectures and 13 credits based on clinical practice. General courses are 3 subjects (5 credits): nursing theory, nursing research. and laws/ethics, Mandatory courses are 8 subjects with 19 credits: advanced physical assessment, pharmacology, pathophysiology, issues in rehabilitation nursing, advanced rehabilitation nursing intervention I. advanced rehabilitation nursing intervention II. sports physiology. special rehabilitation nursing intervention. As for the clinical practice courses, assesment and evaluation for rehabilitation (64 hours), community and home based rehabilitation nursing(128 hours), hospital based rehabilitation nursing(l28 hours), institution based rehabilitation nursing(96 hours) would be treated. 4. Contents of the courses were developed to correspond with the courses' objectives and specific items. 5. Evaluation would be carried out both in the lecure and in the clinical practice. The knowledge and skills of the students would be measured to ensure full validity and credibility. However this developed curriculum should be continuously modified and updated in more desirable direction.

Comparative Study of Fentanyl , Meperidine , and Morphine in Balanced Anesthesia / 대한마취과학회지

The hemodynamic changes during the induction and maintenance of anesthesia, the rapidity of postanesthetic recovery, and side effects were measured and compared in 60 patients receiving either morphine, meperidine, or fentanyl as supplements to balanced anesthesia. Blood pressure, measured through an indwelling arterial catheter, was recorded continuously, as were electrocardiogram and heart rates. The narcotics, made up in equipotent concentration, were given as indicated by hemodynamic and clinical signs. After induction, hemodynamic reponses to laryngoscopy and intubation were more suppressed in patients receiving fentanyl than in patients receiving morphine or meperidine. Meperidine, unilke morphine or fentanyl, significantly increased heart rates. Intraoperatively, mean arterial blood pressure and rate-pressure product were lowest in patients receiving fentanyl. Because of the increase in blood pressure, hart rate, or both to greater than 20% above preanesthetic values, supplementation with a potent inhalatinal agent was necessary, in 25%, 10%, and 10% of the patients given meperidine, morphine, and fentanyl, respectively. Side effects, including histamine release accompanied by tachycardia and hypotension, were most frequent and most severe in patients who received meperidine. Postoperatively, there was more rapid recovery of consciousness with fentanyl than meperidine and morphine and the incidence of postoperative respiratory depression was least with fentanyl. The authors concluded that a moderate dose of fentanyl was a better supplement to balanced anesthesia than morphine or meperidine.